RetromanIE
06-05-2014, 15:23
<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="7" style="vertical-align:top;"><tr><td width="80" align="center" valign="top"><font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"></font></td><td valign="top" class="j"><font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"><br /><div style="padding-top:0.8em;"><img alt="" height="1" width="1" /></div><div class="lh"><a href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=en_ie&usg=AFQjCNF_y_goX5ZnCgBHpdjOugXQTk7MqA&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&cid=52778495548302&ei=rv5oU5iJJKXaiQaUOg&url=http://www.gamesradar.com/activision-budgets-500m-for-destiny/"><b>Activision budgets $500m for Destiny. History tells us that's fine… right?</b></a><br /><font size="-1"><b><font color="#6f6f6f">GamesRadar</font></b></font><br /><font size="-1">The game that cost so much to produce (roughly $100m in today's money by my calculations, although the exact figure is unclear) every <b>Dreamcast</b> owner would have needed to buy it twice just to break even. The game that many people blame for Sega ...</font><br /><font size="-1" class="p"></font><br /><font class="p" size="-1"><a class="p" href="http://news.google.ie/news/more?ncl=daENtknoCzA-zXM&authuser=0&ned=en_ie"><nobr><b>and more »</b></nobr></a></font></div></font></td></tr></table>
More... (http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=en_ie&usg=AFQjCNF_y_goX5ZnCgBHpdjOugXQTk7MqA&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&cid=52778495548302&ei=rv5oU5iJJKXaiQaUOg&url=http://www.gamesradar.com/activision-budgets-500m-for-destiny/)
More... (http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=en_ie&usg=AFQjCNF_y_goX5ZnCgBHpdjOugXQTk7MqA&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&cid=52778495548302&ei=rv5oU5iJJKXaiQaUOg&url=http://www.gamesradar.com/activision-budgets-500m-for-destiny/)