RetromanIE
30-11-2016, 07:45
<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="7" style="vertical-align:top;"><tr><td width="80" align="center" valign="top"><font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"></font></td><td valign="top" class="j"><font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"><br><div style="padding-top:0.8em;"><img alt="" height="1" width="1"></div><div class="lh"><a href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=en_ie&usg=AFQjCNET59es0YGNRM-Ux_oYFHyCJNFjXA&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&ei=noM-WOCAH6m9zAaCiomgDg&url=http://hackaday.com/2016/11/29/slack-backwards-compatible-with-1982/"><b>Slack, Backwards Compatible With 1982</b></a><br><font size="-1"><b><font color="#6f6f6f">Hackaday</font></b></font><br><font size="-1">Slack is great, but there are a few small problems with the current implementations. There isn't a client for Palm, there isn't a client for the Newton, and there isn't a client for the <b>Commodore 64</b>. The last of these severe oversights was recently <b>...</b></font><br><font size="-1" class="p"></font><br><font class="p" size="-1"><a class="p" href="http://news.google.ie/news/more?ncl=dhuM7lAIfbSDSyM&authuser=0&ned=en_ie"><nobr><b></b></nobr></a></font></div></font></td></tr></table>
More... (http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=en_ie&usg=AFQjCNET59es0YGNRM-Ux_oYFHyCJNFjXA&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&ei=noM-WOCAH6m9zAaCiomgDg&url=http://hackaday.com/2016/11/29/slack-backwards-compatible-with-1982/)
More... (http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=en_ie&usg=AFQjCNET59es0YGNRM-Ux_oYFHyCJNFjXA&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&ei=noM-WOCAH6m9zAaCiomgDg&url=http://hackaday.com/2016/11/29/slack-backwards-compatible-with-1982/)